From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby |
Date: | 2016-04-20 07:53:35 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRVN4pifvxNv8Cch9jfxOCGOO1HuQhh4iMAO=UuNaS5og@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The approach introducing the concept of WAL progress addresses the
> problem of unnecessary checkpoints and of unnecessary standby
> snapshots. If we take the problem only from the angle of RUNNING_XACTS
> the current logic used to check if a checkpoint should be skipped or
> not is not addressed.
This discussion has been stalling for a while regarding the main
patches... Attached are rebased versions based on the approach with
XLogInsertExtended(). And I have added as well a couple of days ago an
entry on the 9.6 open item page, not as a 9.6 open item, but as an
older bug to keep at least track of this problem.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
hs-checkpoints-v10-2.patch | text/x-diff | 1.7 KB |
hs-checkpoints-v10.patch | text/x-diff | 14.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | salianjag | 2016-04-20 10:59:47 | BUG #14103: stored function encryption |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-20 03:57:00 | Re: BUG #14101: Postgres Service Crashes With Memory Error And Does Not Recover |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-04-20 08:18:30 | Re: FATAL: could not send end-of-streaming message to primary: no COPY in progress |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-04-20 07:37:06 | Re: Description of ForeignPath |