| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Gersner <gersner(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged Crash Detection |
| Date: | 2017-08-29 20:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRMgwdnWCc7v91Jpg6VJzsmT7J+ypgi10WSHzLsU6mMow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Huh, but that's not particularly meaningful, is it? That'll just as well
> be the case for a freshly created relation, no?
I have assumed that the OP has some control on the timing of the
relations, using an event trigger for example. There is no perfect
method I am afraid.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-29 22:13:57 | Re: Serializable Isolation and read/write conflict with index and different keys |
| Previous Message | Luca Looz | 2017-08-29 16:28:49 | Serializable Isolation and read/write conflict with index and different keys |