Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-12-06 14:27:35
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRFfE-fijjdBQ9yxtGw+Ni7Mryph4OsxnokmS2jdrPvJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks, I looked at that again and problem is fixed as attached.

Er, not exactly... poll_query_until in PostgresNode.pm is using psql
-c without the --no-psqlrc switch so this patch causes the regression
tests of pg_rewind to fail. Fixed as attached.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
20151206_psql_commands_v4.patch binary/octet-stream 18.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-12-06 16:00:07 Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-06 13:56:22 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c