From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |
Date: | 2017-01-07 12:50:32 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRAFVTuJOPivPwGXH_P+7gXWT6wZg2UTE28Uo8mRciUBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> 1) pg_xlogdump --help should mention PGDATA as well for the default
>> behavior, and should make clear the default and when -p is defined:
>> -p, --path=PATH directory in which to find log segment files
>> (default: ./pg_wal)
>
> Ah, good point. The new output is:
>
> -p, --path=PATH directory in which to find log segment files
> (default: current directory, ./pg_wal, $PGDATA/pg_wal)
Looks good, thanks.
>> 2) The documentation does not mention that if a directory is defined
>> pg_xlogdump will try to look as well at defined_dir/pg_wal.
>
> Uh, I think it does in the first sentence:
>
> Directory in which to find log segment files.
I am reading that as "only the current directory", not "the current
directory, then current directory + pg_wal". Do you think that this
sentence implies that the check routine looks as well at
current_dir/pg_wal?
> Updated patch attached.
+ subdirectory of both the current directory and the
+ <envar>PGDATA</envar> directory.
This could say "of both the current directory and *then* the PGDATA
directory" to outline the order of the actions taken by the check
routine. Just my 2c on the matter.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-01-07 16:20:59 | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-01-07 01:02:57 | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |