From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |
Date: | 2017-01-07 16:20:59 |
Message-ID: | 20170107162059.GE3164@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 09:50:32PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> 2) The documentation does not mention that if a directory is defined
> >> pg_xlogdump will try to look as well at defined_dir/pg_wal.
> >
> > Uh, I think it does in the first sentence:
> >
> > Directory in which to find log segment files.
>
> I am reading that as "only the current directory", not "the current
> directory, then current directory + pg_wal". Do you think that this
> sentence implies that the check routine looks as well at
> current_dir/pg_wal?
>
> > Updated patch attached.
>
> + subdirectory of both the current directory and the
> + <envar>PGDATA</envar> directory.
> This could say "of both the current directory and *then* the PGDATA
> directory" to outline the order of the actions taken by the check
> routine. Just my 2c on the matter.
Ah, I see your point. I ended up rewording the text to be more explicit
about the supplied argument and "searching". Updated patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
xlogdump.diff | text/x-diff | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-08 06:27:59 | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-07 12:50:32 | Re: pg_xlogdump -p option correction |