Re: Notice lock waits

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Notice lock waits
Date: 2016-10-03 02:40:55
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR+LMW27bZf8SNs+XiR3yPJDF2EXenODVR62_q-SEdzWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What do you think of Jim Nasby's idea of making a settable level, rather
> just on or off?

[reading the code]
That would be a better idea. The interface proposed, aka 2 GUCs doing
basically the same thing is quite confusing I think. I am marking the
patch as returned with feedback for now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 02:47:56 Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 02:23:38 Re: Bug in to_timestamp().