Re: [HACKERS] eval_const_expresisions and ScalarArrayOpExpr

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] eval_const_expresisions and ScalarArrayOpExpr
Date: 2017-11-30 03:23:58
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQyFxgRDuVeRmWMTFn7fXuw3+3PEdFurk6WyDpG=8XaVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> This patch no longer applies cleanly on HEAD, so here's a rebased version
>> (no substantive changes). As before, I think the most useful review task
>> would be to quantify whether it makes planning noticeably slower.
>
> Rebased again (over the arrays-of-domains patch).

Nobody has showed up with the courage to review this patch. So moved
to next CF. The patch still applies cleanly.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:26:30 Re: [HACKERS] Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:20:13 Re: [HACKERS] create_unique_path and GEQO