From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mahi Gurram <teckymahi(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding B-Tree Lookup |
Date: | 2017-05-02 11:33:16 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQsDsv=y3gxoeMK0s68-Rb2w__3CA+0iC6esOWmzXB+JA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Mahi Gurram <teckymahi(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm building some custom extension on top of postgres 9.6.1. As part of
> that, I would like to read Heap Tuple directly from my extension using
> Primary Key.
>
> By default, postgres table index(B-Tree) its PrimaryKey(PK). So, i would
> like to get TID by doing a lookup into PK's B-Tree index. Using which i
> could read HeapTuple directly.
>
> Please suggest me the easiest way to lookup into PK's B-Tree index for
> getting TIDs.
Why don't you just use SPI within your extension? No need to copy the
logic for btree lookups this way.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/spi.html
> Suggesting a postgres extensions which does B-Tree lookup will also helps
> me.
contrib/amcheck looks at raw btree data, though I am not sure that you
actually need to go down to that. But that's hard to reach a
conclusion without more details.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hariprasath nallasamy | 2017-05-02 11:54:11 | Shared Memory hash tables only at startup |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-02 11:22:01 | Re: [Proposal]: Extends VisualStudio to automatically precompile EmbeddedSQL |