From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Detailed release notes |
Date: | 2024-08-05 11:16:23 |
Message-ID: | CAB-JLwbErUkZqcOXpf6vAy7EUBMgiHC3xB5oKdSOqjOMar8_Vw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 5 de ago. de 2024 às 07:54, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
>
> [commitId_link1, commitId_link2]: Change functions to use a safe
> search_path during maintenance operations (Jeff Davis)
>
I don't like that prefix dirtying each item.
I think having just a link after every item would be better.
Firstly because in English we read left to right and
also because we don't need the commit code. So it would be
- Change functions to use a safe search_path during maintenance
operations (Jeff Davis) [link1, link2]
or just a number to it
- Change functions to use a safe search_path during maintenance
operations (Jeff Davis) [1, 2]
regards
Marcos
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-08-05 11:26:23 | Re: Speed up JSON escape processing with SIMD plus other optimisations |
Previous Message | Michail Nikolaev | 2024-08-05 11:11:50 | Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative |