| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Date: | 2024-11-20 14:14:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwYMw1pORoZxA9XeR52Svps6ah=ATgRDHdGQBT+j+Uy7qQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Em qua., 20 de nov. de 2024 às 10:52, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
> COMMIT can be a little bit messy. TRANSACTION END is more intuitive, I
> think.
>
>>
Exactly to be not messy I would just ON COMMIT for all, and DOCs can
explain that this option is ignored for temp objects and do the same at the
end of transaction, independently if commited or rolled back
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-20 14:20:18 | Re: per backend I/O statistics |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-20 14:10:23 | Re: per backend I/O statistics |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-11-20 14:57:23 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-11-20 13:52:16 | Re: proposal: schema variables |