Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Mark Rotteveel <mark(at)lawinegevaar(dot)nl>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix
Date: 2016-01-15 14:15:09
Message-ID: CAB=Je-Fg4iK0o0fB96uZsbfQdTtTj+XkeYxEcFR_+jF6vdKy0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

>* jre07-9.4.1207

This is not a valid Maven version.
Valid version should be <major>.<minor>.<patch><qualifier> where
major/minor/patch are numerics

We'd probably better follow "plug&pray" development style and go ahead
with jre6/jre7/jre8 then.

Any volunteers to prepare such a PR? (I'm not sure if there's anything
more than mvn versions:set is required)

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Whiting 2016-01-15 14:16:31 Re: Connection to PgSQL does not use SSL with JDBC driver 9.4 if the parameter is passed through Properties rather than URL
Previous Message Sehrope Sarkuni 2016-01-15 14:04:34 Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix