Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im>
Subject: Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please
Date: 2016-01-25 14:07:49
Message-ID: CAB=Je-F9B-JJKoTKGCiUQfSMbNw4fG2y9ogrCj1+Y+ybFZ_VrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Pavel> This is probably build product

It is a set of source files. You can't deny that.
You want the source, you get it.
The build script is missing, but *.spec is much better then as you
would be absolutely sure that nothing "unexpected" passes through.

Pavel>we can't bundle stuff like that.

There's no need to bundle that. It is a compile-time dependency to
build OSGi-enabled pgjdbc.

Vladimir>> if everybody redistributes the jar?
Pavel>I don't understand this, can you elaborate please?

From my experience, 99.9% of projects redistribute the required java libraries.
I've never seen cases when the jar files were pulled from PRMs coming
with the OS.

I wonder if there are live uses of "pgjdbc.rpm".

Pavel> I'm working on small Java project that needs to connect to
Pavel>PostgreSQL.

Virtually all development requires not just "jar files" that can talk
to the database, but development requires "javadoc&source" jars.
Javadoc&source jars are used to look into pgjdbc source
code&documentation and double-check if the method you are going to
apply indeed does what you think it should do.

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-25 14:11:51 Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-01-25 13:54:23 Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please