From: | Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jing Li <jingli(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Teng Zhang <tezhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin4][Patch] Greenplum specific DDL and Dashboard display |
Date: | 2017-08-25 12:39:32 |
Message-ID: | CAAtBm9XeSE3btNCJ+jc0YCiGmZ-U0AJG=kt75X8qz2mAn6GdbQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Given that Greenplum is going to GA next month can we get that stable OSS
version included in the CI?
Rob
On Aug 25, 2017 8:27 AM, "Akshay Joshi" <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks patch applied. I haven't tested it on GPDB.
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm suggesting that it be pushed
>>>
>> Akshay is already on to it, and currently reviewing it.
>> Will push it once get the confirmation.
>>
>> -- Thanks, Ashesh
>>
>>>
>>> Dave Cramer
>>>
>>> On 24 August 2017 at 23:00, Teng Zhang <tezhang(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure, you can get as much as you like.
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>> Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:34 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [pgadmin4][Patch] Greenplum specific DDL and Dashboard
>>>> display
>>>> To: Teng Zhang <tezhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>> Cc: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <
>>>> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jing
>>>> Li <jingli(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can we get some movement on this patch? This seems like a more sane way
>>>> to go to support different "products"
>>>>
>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>
>>>> On 22 August 2017 at 16:56, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 August 2017 at 16:41, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Surely this :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> self.table_template_path = 'table/sql/' + (
>>>>>> + '#{0}#{1}#'.format(server_type, ver)
>>>>>> + if server_type == 'gpdb' else
>>>>>> + '#{0}#'.format(ver)
>>>>>> + )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> could be written in a more readable manner ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies, after reading a bit, this is apparently idiomatic python.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please ignore
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 August 2017 at 14:25, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been able to get back to this and test it. So far so good. It
>>>>>>> applies more or less cleanly against 1.6 and everything I've tried so far
>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll update more as I test it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 August 2017 at 05:29, Teng Zhang <tezhang(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the review, here is a fixed patch working for GBDP which
>>>>>>>> shows the appropriate graphs.
>>>>>>>> In this fix, we toke out the changes to diver/psycopg2 and
>>>>>>>> implemented the greenplum version checking process in the ppas way
>>>>>>>> mentioned by Dave Cramer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Teng Zhang & Hao Wang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ashesh, do you have a recommended way to do this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I haven't looked at the patch, but I assume it adds a database
>>>>>>>>>> driver module for GPDB?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have not looked at the patch yet.
>>>>>>>>> I will take a look at it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jing Li <jingli(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since we're hoping to get this change working for GPDB we've
>>>>>>>>>>> currently using this method to detect if it's gpdb and show the appropriate
>>>>>>>>>>> graphs. Right now it displays errors on the dashboard if it's connected to
>>>>>>>>>>> a gpdb server.
>>>>>>>>>>> For this patch specifically, the goal is to improve the
>>>>>>>>>>> experience for greenplum users so they can get the same information as
>>>>>>>>>>> someone connected to a postgres server.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I do agree that this is a bigger discussion about how we handle
>>>>>>>>>>> behavior change overall if it's regular postgres or something else. Let's
>>>>>>>>>>> talk about how we can restructure this behavior in a wider context. Are you
>>>>>>>>>>> open to meeting about it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> ~Jing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 5:37 AM, Dave Cramer davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Violet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't really like the way this has been implemented. It adds
>>>>>>>>>>>> a variable which is only used for gpdb.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are other places in the code where the behaviour is
>>>>>>>>>>>> changed if the server is ppas or regular postgres.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Candidly I think all of this needs restructuring.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Cramer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 August 2017 at 23:29, Violet Cheng <vcheng(at)pivotal(dot)io>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any comment on this patch? If no, will it be committed soon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Violet
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Sarah McAlear <
>>>>>>>>>>>> smcalear(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hackers!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch enables Greenplum users to see the same charts on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the dashboard as postgres users. It also adds some additional information
>>>>>>>>>>>> to the DDL that is Greenplum specific and necessary to create a new table.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarah
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Akshay Joshi*
> *Principal Software Engineer *
>
>
>
> *Phone: +91 20-3058-9517 <+91%2020%203058%209517>Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
> <+91%2097678%2088246>*
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2017-08-25 13:45:12 | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Allow user to provide custom SSL certificates and provide .pgpass file |
Previous Message | Akshay Joshi | 2017-08-25 12:27:09 | Re: [pgadmin4][Patch] Greenplum specific DDL and Dashboard display |