Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Walker Philips <wphilips53(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Date: 2022-07-16 00:41:04
Message-ID: CAApHDvr=w2Vv_Z8uk-Zoihz74qs=t7+w3k71eKOufS96pJy6ww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 12:14, Walker Philips <wphilips53(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following function's metadata is not correctly reported in the pg_proc table (see picture below).

Seems quite unlikely this such a fundamental thing could be broken.

Can you share which version of PostgreSQL you see this on?

I see the proargtypes populated properly on current master.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-16 00:45:27 Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Previous Message Walker Philips 2022-07-15 23:37:47 pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty