Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Walker Philips <wphilips53(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Date: 2022-07-16 00:54:58
Message-ID: 3559795.1657932898@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Can you share which version of PostgreSQL you see this on?

Hmm ... looking more closely, it's definitely not stock PG,
because proargtypes is oidvector which would not include any
curly braces in the output.

Hard to tell what's going on exactly; seems like it could be
corrupt catalog data or faulty code modifications. Or maybe
there's something wrong with whatever the viewing tool is?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Walker Philips 2022-07-16 21:20:45 Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-16 00:45:27 Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty