Re: FW: REVIEW: Allow formatting in log_line_prefix

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: REVIEW: Allow formatting in log_line_prefix
Date: 2013-09-26 19:55:17
Message-ID: CAApHDvqbLMtD5P+6q0msSzJDQYpU+T-QPOd8EQozLyT-3_Wdbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Ok, I think I've managed to narrow the performance gap to just about
> nothing
> > but noise, though to do this the code is now a bit bigger. I've added a
> > series of tests to see if the padding is > 0 and if it's not then I'm
> doing
> > things the old way.
> >
> > I've also added a some code which does a fast test to see if it is worth
> > while calling the padding processing function. This is just a simple if
> (*p
> > <= '9'), I'm not completely happy with that as it does look a bit weird,
> but
> > to compensate I've added a good comment to explain what it is doing.
> >
> > Please find attached the new patch ... version v0.5 and also updated
> > benchmark results.
>
> Are you sure this is the right set of benchmark results? This still
> reflects a 15-18% slowdown AFAICS.
>
>
I think I must have forgot to save it before I emailed it...

Here's the correct version.

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
log_line_prefix_benchmark_stresslog_v0.5.xls application/vnd.ms-excel 8.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-09-26 19:58:07 Re: dynamic shared memory
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-26 19:46:23 Re: Minmax indexes