From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remove shadowed declaration warnings |
Date: | 2024-09-12 02:25:38 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvqaa3YXqTF2cZ0ocwXvvpqEwAPHpBAO_0Sfwa6ORhYYHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 14:03, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I do grant that sometimes shadowing of locals can cause bugs. I don't
> recall right now why we opted for -Wshadow=compatible-local over
> -Wshadow=local, but we could certainly take another look at that.
I don't recall if it was discussed, but certainly, it was an easier
goal to achieve.
Looks like there are currently 47 warnings with -Wshadow=local. I'm
not quite sure what the definition of "compatible" is for this flag,
but looking at one warning in pgbench.c:4548, I see an int shadowing a
bool. So maybe -Wshadow=local is worthwhile.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-09-12 02:28:14 | Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2024-09-12 02:24:52 | Re: json_query conditional wrapper bug |