Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions
Date: 2024-04-15 02:03:02
Message-ID: CAApHDvqUpX7OnXZ0FeQX9SB=i320u2CXbuD02Cdgjki9mB0WnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 13:37, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seems we can improve things by simply removing the "rule of thumb" sentence altogether. The prior paragraph states the things the queryid depends upon at the level of detail the reader needs.

I don't think that addresses the following, which I mentioned earlier:

> but not stable across *major* versions does *not* mean stable across
> *minor* versions. The reader is just left guessing if that's true.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-15 02:09:13 Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-04-15 01:58:35 Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions