Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date: 2025-04-10 23:45:57
Message-ID: CAApHDvqGCdV2p_MRNYk7G9scRzNYPN8PbhmdRcbzeLjMtHZv-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 02:01, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I created an entry for the July CF
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5691/
>
> ... and I realized I forgot to include David's code comment patch yesterday,
> Reattaching both patches.

I've pushed the code comment patch.

For the docs patch, the fact you're having to name specific fields in
the note at the bottom makes me think the details should be added to
the row for the field in question instead.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-04-11 00:08:22 Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-04-10 23:45:36 Re: stats.sql fails during installcheck on mac