Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date: 2025-04-10 14:01:05
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0vuFNrFUS-5LtQer=Xi8ye3Jg=3q98pZas5o0UXZByEEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I created an entry for the July CF
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5691/

... and I realized I forgot to include David's code comment patch yesterday,
Reattaching both patches.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Add-code-comment-for-ins_since_vacuum.patch application/octet-stream 1.7 KB
v1-0002-Clarify-when-aborted-and-committed-rows-are-track.patch application/octet-stream 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2025-04-10 14:40:39 Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-04-10 13:58:01 Re: PostgreSQL 18 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze