Re: enable_resultcache confusion

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Date: 2021-07-09 15:35:29
Message-ID: CAApHDvq4m=qd+RL=EsEGtTp4NNWm2FR-CrRY8Yx+a4R7Rd6wNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 06:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?

I really like that name.

I'll wait to see if anyone else wants to voice their opinion before I
do any renaming work.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-07-09 15:54:19 What are exactly bootstrap processes, auxiliary processes, standalone backends, normal backends(user sessions)?
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-07-09 15:28:38 Re: short circuit suggestion in find_hash_columns()