| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: enable_resultcache confusion |
| Date: | 2021-07-08 18:00:12 |
| Message-ID: | 2034428.1625767212@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> "enable_nodememoization" would work for me
That seems pretty unreadable. Maybe just "enable_memoization"?
Really if we're going to do something here, we can't merely mess
with the GUC name. David had expressed a willingness to rename
everything about ResultCache some time ago, but nobody stepped up
with a better name.
Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-07-08 18:01:59 | Re: enable_resultcache confusion |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-07-08 17:52:38 | Re: enable_resultcache confusion |