| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans |
| Date: | 2020-06-19 05:27:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvq=0n6y3dX5JHqS9psJ_dBj9Z-ADsh0AO9dCFoUNMKvcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 15:28, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 15:37 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes both the missing parallel worker information
> > and puts the properties on a single line for format=text.
>
> Thank you.
>
> I noticed some strange results in one case where one worker had a lot
> more batches than another. After I investigated, I think everything is
> fine -- it seems that one worker was getting more tuples from the
> underlying parallel scan. So everything looks good to me.
Thanks for having a look at this. I just pushed it.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-06-19 05:29:38 | Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-06-19 05:19:16 | missing support for Microsoft VSS Writer |