Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Date: 2020-06-19 03:28:30
Message-ID: 258e053f0c555b01912f2c48c2ade9f7295a3604.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 15:37 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> The attached patch fixes both the missing parallel worker information
> and puts the properties on a single line for format=text.

Thank you.

I noticed some strange results in one case where one worker had a lot
more batches than another. After I investigated, I think everything is
fine -- it seems that one worker was getting more tuples from the
underlying parallel scan. So everything looks good to me.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-06-19 03:29:48 Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-06-19 03:13:56 Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view