From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column |
Date: | 2024-08-14 22:28:43 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvpw2r1XS4LaN90dkfaSOsWuyj_HDevV6avtn+EMe1fUxQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 16:52, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 5:45 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's the patch updated to do the validation inside AlterPublicationTables().
>
> I think we've come full circle -- your fix is now pretty much the same
> as my v3 patch [1].
Thanks for having a look at the patch.
I don't agree that this is full circle. My motivation for the
additional changes is the API cleanliness of the function you're
making extern. I mentioned this in my 2nd paragraph in [1]. I didn't
like that you wanted to make the external function populate an array
and a Bitmapset with the same information. I think just having the
Bitmapset is fine and the array adds needless overhead and confusion.
As for this being backpatched or not. For me, about 51% of me thinks
this is fine for a master-only fix.
Does anyone else have any thoughts about back-patching the fix?
David
[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2i1j_iCFcURx5q7jYe70qk4Ca7J+8Dt9_jSMOdooAOA@mail.gmail.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-08-14 22:34:10 | Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column |
Previous Message | Cameron Vogt | 2024-08-14 21:59:53 | Re: TLS session tickets disabled? |