| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Speeding Up Bitmapset |
| Date: | 2023-06-26 04:20:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvpaWoT+Nx0iMaJ2rbD1eYx2J66Urs4=jQQg=CX32pFfHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 at 12:55, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Em dom., 25 de jun. de 2023 às 17:49, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
>>
>> There's no reason in the world
>> that those will speed up Bitmapsets, so why include them?
>
> Of course optimization is the most important thing,
> but since you're going to touch the source, why not make it more readable.
Have a look at [1]. In particular "Reasons your patch might be
returned" and precisely "Reformatting lines that haven't changed"
That entire page is quite valuable and I'd recommend having a read of all of it.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-06-26 05:45:28 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-06-26 04:18:24 | Re: Assert while autovacuum was executing |