| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster? |
| Date: | 2023-05-31 02:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvokWk+QWNL5X22XQuygwuHtTwc_+Sg1GufXRQvuvFrzcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:05:10PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > "Relation extensions have been improved allowing faster bulk loading
> > of data using COPY. These improvements are more significant when
> > multiple processes are concurrently loading data into the same table."
>
> The release notes don't normally get into details on the magnitude of
> the improvement in various circumstances.
Sorry, I meant the release announcement rather than the release notes here.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-05-31 02:28:58 | Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-05-31 02:11:38 | Re: Pg 16: will pg_dump & pg_restore be faster? |