Re: Restore support for USE_ASSERT_CHECKING in extensions only

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Kane <andrew(at)ankane(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Restore support for USE_ASSERT_CHECKING in extensions only
Date: 2025-01-10 23:17:23
Message-ID: CAApHDvogqCoP_aw3_6CySi8eOgD0BPV3+1pBKtGZUGT=EHj6LA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 at 11:27, Andrew Kane <andrew(at)ankane(dot)org> wrote:
> Prior to 6f3820f, extensions could be compiled with -DUSE_ASSERT_CHECKING whether or not the Postgres installation was configured with --enable-cassert (to enable at least some assertion checking). However, after 6f3820f, linking fails with `undefined symbol: verify_compact_attribute`. I'm not sure if this use case is officially supported, but it has been helpful for developing pgvector.
>
> The attached patch fixes it, but there may be a better way to do this.

hmm, I didn't think of that scenario. I think since
verify_compact_attribute() does nothing when USE_ASSERT_CHECKING isn't
defined that we might as well define a ((void) 0) macro to avoid the
undefined symbol error. That'll avoid the useless call in your debug
builds.

I looked around for inspiration and that's what pgstat_assert_is_up()
does. Most of the other examples are static functions.

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_verify_compact_attribute.patch application/octet-stream 513 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2025-01-10 23:25:48 Re: Proposal: add new API to stringinfo
Previous Message Abhishek Chanda 2025-01-10 23:16:44 Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend