Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?

From: Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: cjgunzel(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?
Date: 2018-07-15 20:22:24
Message-ID: CAAfz9KOrDMHhJdxb-N9UXvZh628crQvSyhKNAg15cX4_wPmwsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

вс, 15 июл. 2018 г. в 23:05, Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> What would this new IDE offer which a product like dbeaver does not have.
>
AFAIK, DBeaver:
- covers many DBMS (I want to focus on PostgreSQL);
- full fledged IDE with feature rich editor (I want a lightweight tool
that can be used from
command line or from GUI to help SQL code refactoring in your favorite
editor);
- written in Java (I develop in C++).

This is what I can currently say about my plans on this project.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ravi Krishna 2018-07-15 20:50:44 Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-15 20:16:46 Re: two instances of postgres on the same machine?