| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.1.2 ? |
| Date: | 2011-11-09 21:00:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAAZKuFbiFuG9A9BuKgC5K206aykUEBw569wamRa_8gSdRP2j1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
>> you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
>
> I have confirmed that the clog/subtrans fixes allow us to start up
> while in hot standby on otherwise problematic base backups.
Also, this is something of a big deal to us; otherwise it happens
frequently enough that I cannot claim that I can use hot standby in an
unattended, automated way.
--
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-09 21:01:55 | Re: const correctness |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2011-11-09 20:58:16 | Re: 9.1.2 ? |