Re: 9.1.2 ?

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 9.1.2 ?
Date: 2011-11-09 20:58:16
Message-ID: CAAZKuFYS-wPVeWoFdyJ+hL-Qr5P5AMw9VDusfEhG3uwEE_e-ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
> you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...

I have confirmed that the clog/subtrans fixes allow us to start up
while in hot standby on otherwise problematic base backups.

--
fdr

In response to

  • Re: 9.1.2 ? at 2011-11-09 05:06:37 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2011-11-09 21:00:09 Re: 9.1.2 ?
Previous Message Rudyar Cortés 2011-11-09 20:51:21 MPI programming in postgreSQL backend source code