Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Slave Failover with PITR

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Ken Brush <kbrush(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Slave Failover with PITR
Date: 2012-09-03 06:58:04
Message-ID: CAAZKuFbZao29XnOZDXDhdu+EcL5OKvb+4Hrdffrbb2bkTD6eow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Do we ever want to document a way to connect slaves to a new master,
> rather than recreating the slave?

Please, please please do so. And hopefully it'll be less tricky
sooner than later.

--
fdr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Himanshu Joshi 2012-09-03 07:43:26 Postgres not getting logged in from command prompt
Previous Message Harshitha S 2012-09-03 06:30:04 Reduce the time to know trigger_fi​le's existence

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-09-03 07:10:58 Is this non-volatile pointer access OK?
Previous Message Harshitha S 2012-09-03 06:30:04 Reduce the time to know trigger_fi​le's existence