Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Slave Failover with PITR

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ken Brush <kbrush(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Slave Failover with PITR
Date: 2012-09-04 04:31:23
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob7KhCRXzOJx3pMyz130kKECfGvufJMkKfXtyMc+YTSLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Do we ever want to document a way to connect slaves to a new master,
>> rather than recreating the slave?
>
> Please, please please do so. And hopefully it'll be less tricky
> sooner than later.

Agreed. But let's make sure that whatever we document is, in fact, correct.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yvon Thoraval 2012-09-04 06:31:34 recovering databases
Previous Message Harshitha S 2012-09-04 04:15:04 Re: [GENERAL] Reduce the time to know trigger_fi​le's existence

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2012-09-04 04:57:37 Some whitespaces in utility.c
Previous Message Noah Misch 2012-09-04 04:21:59 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol