From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest" |
Date: | 2022-10-25 22:55:28 |
Message-ID: | CAAWbhmhTAJdw9QSX7MhZpEaAuc9i9P-KZSwZAzOOfN3pzERgrA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:45 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2022-08-08 08:37:41 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > Agreed. This probably bleeds over into the other documentation thread
> > a bit -- how do we want to communicate the subtle points to people in
> > a CF?
>
> We should write a docs patch for it and then reference if from a bunch of
> places. I started down that road a few years back [1] but unfortunately lost
> steam.
As we approach a new CF, I'm reminded of this patch again.
Are there any concerns preventing a consensus here, that I can help
with? I can draft the docs patch that Andres has suggested, if that's
seen as a prerequisite.
Thanks,
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-10-25 23:15:32 | Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y |
Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2022-10-25 22:45:20 | Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for ALTER TABLE on identity columns |