From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions |
Date: | 2013-04-30 13:32:29 |
Message-ID: | CAASwCXe2UOAQN+VZdhEhAMVbyFwfhNPOnEADHkZQztOoQEnp-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Go for it? :) I don't think you'll find much disagreement here, but
> it's no trivial thing to do either.. Perhaps some kind of one-time
> startup "script" that gets run? Or maybe an internal identifier that
> The above doesn't really seem like a response to the piece quoted, so
> I'll respond to just what you wrote- I agree. Let's figure out a way to
> update sql-language functions. Once we have that, it'll certainly open
> up the door to having more of them. I don't think we can punt on this
> as a "well, we'll do it when we need it"; we've needed it in the past
> (as I recall, we've had to tell people in the release notes to hack the
> catalog for some issue or another at least once in most major revs..)
> and it'd be great to have the problem solved.
> Sounds fantastic.
Thanks for the motivational speech! :) I'll start working on it today!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-04-30 13:43:02 | Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-04-30 13:12:47 | Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions |