| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Provide much better wait information in pg_stat_activity. |
| Date: | 2016-03-13 02:27:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAASwCXdsToyEAg-pERB_V9vNrTKfZc5EJYvhRDyNYyd4yhisqA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In short: we've already been over this territory, at length,
> and I am not excited by people trying to bikeshed it again
> after the fact, especially when no new arguments are being
> presented. Can we call the discussion closed, please?
Closed, at least from my side.
I'm grateful to have learned at least a bit more about when it's OK
to sacrifice backwards-compatibility.
Sorry for spamming this thread on that topic,
I'll instead wade through the archives to see what more I can learn
to hopefully become less confused.
Thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-13 02:58:11 | Re: pgsql: Widen query numbers-of-tuples-processed counters to uint64. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-12 23:17:05 | pgsql: Get rid of scribbling on a const variable in psql's print.c. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-13 02:30:16 | MinGW versus _strtoui64() ? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-03-13 01:21:15 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18 |