From: | Kartik Ohri <kartikohri13(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Cc: | pljava-dev(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/Java new build plugin |
Date: | 2020-08-14 02:44:55 |
Message-ID: | CAASLQ4OEbbz1D7eH-fHPcSwA2u4cPqUV_=+TXZz4wW+0UWX-Dw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 3:02 AM Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
> On 08/13/20 17:24, Kartik Ohri wrote:
> > I have made the changes to the ProcessBuilder and am now trying to use it
> > build pljava-so using it. I wanted to ask should the working directory
> for
> > the process builder be hard coded as the project's target directory or
> left
> > for the user to specify as an argument.
>
> Hmm, that's a good question.
>
> What if ... instead of script calling new ProcessBuilder(...) to obtain
> an instance, we provide a method (with the same signature), that calls
> the constructor and returns a ProcessBuilder with some common defaults
> already configured?
>
> Then the script can just change any bits it wants different from the
> default.
>
> Regards,
> -Chap
>
Sounds good to me. Will do it this way.
Regards,
Kartik
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2020-08-14 12:28:48 | Re: the ReportScriptingMojo |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2020-08-13 21:32:19 | Re: PL/Java new build plugin |