From: | Brent Tubbs <brent(dot)tubbs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Geoff Tolley <geoff(dot)tolley(at)yougov(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: unexpected PQresultStatus: 8 with simple logical replication |
Date: | 2015-01-10 22:38:42 |
Message-ID: | CAAOBOv9_C+goUp_vFOOp=oZxjuy9KwqDLau-JO2BHNNSaPRgpw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I mixed up my email threads. I was following
http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-9-4-feature-highlight-logical-replication-protocol/
Looking back at it now, I can see that it didn't use psql to call
START_REPLICATION.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 2015-01-10 10:24:56 -0800, Brent Tubbs wrote:
> > That's working! The blog posts I linked earlier
>
> Which blogpost is that? At least this thread doesn't seem to contain a
> reference.
>
> > made me think that I had to explicitly call START_REPLICATION, but I
> > guess that's not necessary?
>
> START_REPLICATION over a replication connection is the streaming variant
> of logical decoding. Unfortunately psql can't deal with that (and it
> doesn't make sense to support it, as you need to send back feedback
> messages and such). The SQL function Michael linked to are there for
> easier accessibility, but don't support streaming. Other than that,
> they're the same.
>
> Hope that clears up things a bit?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | deepak | 2015-01-10 23:36:38 | Re: How to exclude building/installing contrib modules on Windows |
Previous Message | Michael Nolan | 2015-01-10 21:11:40 | Re: How to analyze a slowdown in 9.3.5? |