| From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum |
| Date: | 2025-01-15 20:03:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAAKRu_b5bncDjzZwquj1G1AdKF4-UcPjTKwfCyrt6Acj9SfkUw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:36 PM Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>>
>> On 14.01.2025 22:51, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
>
> There is a typo on committed vacuumlazy.c file
> * If the TID store fills up in phase I, vacuum suspends phase I, proceeds to
> * phases II and II, cleaning up the dead tuples referenced in the current TID
> * store. This empties the TID store resumes phase I.
>
> Probably you meant phases II and III
Oops. Thanks for catching this. I'll fix that and the following
sentence in the main patch proposed in this thread to avoid extra
noise.
- Melanie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-01-15 20:05:29 | Re: Purpose of wal_init_zero |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-01-15 19:51:23 | Re: IWYU annotations |