Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum
Date: 2025-02-11 18:57:25
Message-ID: CAAKRu_ai6hWbDgJdqiz1Ty+ozJVOBk=38ACDOpxkwgnaZS1JrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:31 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-02-05 12:23:29 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > Attached v16 implements the logic to not count pages we failed to
> > freeze because of cleanup lock contention as eager freeze failures.
>
> That looks good to me.

Cool. Committed and marked as such in the cf app.

- Melanie

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2025-02-11 19:00:27 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-02-11 18:54:40 Re: RFC: Allow EXPLAIN to Output Page Fault Information