Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum
Date: 2025-02-11 16:31:46
Message-ID: 4fpogf3v5h372sbktnyqog7tp2zcn45dvf2usjc3ivafrlbqpl@624lhud44z4d
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-02-05 12:23:29 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> Attached v16 implements the logic to not count pages we failed to
> freeze because of cleanup lock contention as eager freeze failures.

That looks good to me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2025-02-11 16:32:32 Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2025-02-11 16:25:55 Re: Adding a '--clean-publisher-objects' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility.