Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature

From: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
Date: 2025-01-16 13:25:43
Message-ID: CAAJ_b97vA3MoMSqY6MGpcPyBMYPefrQ2j7NNojRVH5jBzzNFeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 6:07 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 11.01.25 18:26, Amul Sul wrote:
> > On Saturday, 11 January 2025, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org
> > <mailto:peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>> wrote:
> >
> > I have applied v8-0001, with some editing of the documentation and
> > in the tests. I'll continue reviewing the subsequent patches.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the improvement and commit.
>
> I have also committed v8-0002, the refactor of ATExecAlterConstrRecurse().
>
> All the remaining patches go together, so w are now waiting on an
> updated patch set from you.
>

Thanks!

Yes, I'm working on it and will post it tomorrow.

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Orlov 2025-01-16 13:32:09 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Previous Message Anthonin Bonnefoy 2025-01-16 13:24:41 Re: Accept recovery conflict interrupt on blocked writing