Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
Date: 2025-01-16 12:37:56
Message-ID: 00f4344a-9544-48a8-97d8-35e24a618dc9@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11.01.25 18:26, Amul Sul wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 January 2025, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org
> <mailto:peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> I have applied v8-0001, with some editing of the documentation and
> in the tests.  I'll continue reviewing the subsequent patches.
>
>
> Thank you for the improvement and commit.

I have also committed v8-0002, the refactor of ATExecAlterConstrRecurse().

All the remaining patches go together, so w are now waiting on an
updated patch set from you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2025-01-16 13:01:44 Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Previous Message Shubham Khanna 2025-01-16 11:24:01 Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility.