Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2017-02-09 06:22:03
Message-ID: CAAJ_b97eOH3GXa6=SCfr8DxifqrsrPUB=KZwCH3dZwdkz9t+Zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

About 0001-Check-partition-strategy-in-ATExecDropNotNull.patch,
following test is already covered in alter_table.sql @ Line # 1918,
instead of this kindly add test for list_partition:

77 +-- cannot drop NOT NULL constraint of a range partition key column
78 +ALTER TABLE range_parted ALTER a DROP NOT NULL;
79 +

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-09 06:33:35 Re: Parallel Index Scans
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-02-09 05:48:47 Re: WAL consistency check facility