Re: Detach partition with constraint test

From: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Detach partition with constraint test
Date: 2025-04-04 04:01:01
Message-ID: CAAJ_b9657KoLOUjy_vd-oJE+FA_mSkm_nAoTOjReGV+nGj-Gag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 5:52 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I tested the "not enforced" constraint feature extensively today
> especially the cases of partitioned table. Everything seems to be
> working fine.
>
> While doing that, I found that foreign_key.sql does not have a test to
> make sure that a partition continues to have the constraints in the
> same state after detaching. Here's a 0001 patch adding those tests in
> the same block as the not enforced constraints. Probably we could add
> similar test in other blocks as well, but I haven't done that yet.
> Checking if something like this would be acceptable.
>
> 0002 fixes a comment in the same block.
>

Thanks for the testing; both patches look quite reasonable to me.

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-04-04 04:06:43 Re: Improve error reporting for few options in pg_createsubscriber
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-04-04 03:28:27 RE: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true