From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Use better comment marker in Autoconf input |
Date: | 2019-02-11 20:52:57 |
Message-ID: | CAA8=A79X26pNCUVHr5myEUhxmSLjXwh41=bqdUVtj4KnVoAOCQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Yup, the buildfarm script only knows to nuke it if "configure" changes.
> If you change the critter's buildfarm parameters, or the build
> environment, that might require revisiting configure tests, but it won't
> happen automatically. I can't think of any really easy way to improve
> that.
>
Could stash a checksum of the config settings and obsolete the cache
if there was a mismatch. The danger is that we could get some false
positives, but the only downside to that is a one time extra amount of
time spent in configure.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-11 21:18:20 | pgsql: Stamp 11.2. |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-02-11 20:35:43 | Re: pgsql: Use better comment marker in Autoconf input |