>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thank you very much for your feedback.
>
> That's a good idea to see individual images. But in my opinion, for
> geometry data, user often tend to see not only the individual shapes, but
> also the locations, spatial relations and distribution in a map. For
> example, if the geometries are all points, displaying the single point
> won't show much information.
>
> So I think rendering the output geometry data in map is necessary. If the
> user want to see the shape of a single geometry, he/she can select the
> related row in the data grid, then the viewer can highlight the geometry in
> the map.
>
> Thank you for your suggestion and please let me know if you want to
> discuss this matter further.
>
> Regards,
> Xuri
>
>