From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Logging parallel worker draught |
Date: | 2025-02-03 05:36:52 |
Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0tHb_hpq472oMj6S8F5kgXiOE-mV9QYSJOjn4g+CvZXmA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The "story" I have in mind is: I need to audit an instance I know
> nothing about. I ask the client to adapt the logging parameters for
> pgbadger (including this one), collect the logs and generate a report
> for the said period to have a broad overview of what is happenning.
Let's see if anyone has a different opinion.
As far as the current set of patches, I had some other changes that
I missed earlier; indentation to the calls in LogParallelWorkersIfNeeded
and comment for the LogParallelWorkersIfNeeded function. I also re-worked the
setup of the GUC as it was not setup the same way as other
GUCs with an options list. I ended up just making those changes
in v8.
Besides that, I think this is ready for committer.
Regards,
Sami
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0002-Setup-counters-for-parallel-vacuums.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
v8-0001-Add-a-guc-for-parallel-worker-logging.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.0 KB |
v8-0003-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-u.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.3 KB |
v8-0004-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-q.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-02-03 05:43:31 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
Previous Message | Amul Sul | 2025-02-03 05:30:00 | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |