Re: Fix a comment in worker.c

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Date: 2022-02-16 11:26:53
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LZ7C555XSpBQVi3Md8OyAoveju1xVyq-NgJjFEFDzN0w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While reading the code, I realized that the second sentence of the
> following comment in worker.c is not correct:
>
> /*
> * Exit if the subscription was disabled. This normally should not happen
> * as the worker gets killed during ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE.
> */
> if (!newsub->enabled)
> {
> ereport(LOG,
> (errmsg("logical replication apply worker for
> subscription \"%s\" will "
> "stop because the subscription was disabled",
> MySubscription->name)));
>
> proc_exit(0);
> }
>
> IIUC the apply worker normally exits here when the subscription is
> disabled since we don't stop the apply worker during ALTER
> SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE. I've attached a patch to remove it.
>

Yes, I also have the same understanding. Your patch LGTM. I'll push
this unless someone thinks otherwise.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-02-16 11:36:18 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-02-16 11:20:54 Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.