Re: Fix a comment in worker.c

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Date: 2022-02-18 04:48:17
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JSzM3fhxCAQq=4K9W6xUiFvhq2cWos1X2d7WwU2gMUjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While reading the code, I realized that the second sentence of the
> > following comment in worker.c is not correct:
> >
> > /*
> > * Exit if the subscription was disabled. This normally should not happen
> > * as the worker gets killed during ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE.
> > */
> > if (!newsub->enabled)
> > {
> > ereport(LOG,
> > (errmsg("logical replication apply worker for
> > subscription \"%s\" will "
> > "stop because the subscription was disabled",
> > MySubscription->name)));
> >
> > proc_exit(0);
> > }
> >
> > IIUC the apply worker normally exits here when the subscription is
> > disabled since we don't stop the apply worker during ALTER
> > SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE. I've attached a patch to remove it.
> >
>
> Yes, I also have the same understanding. Your patch LGTM. I'll push
> this unless someone thinks otherwise.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-02-18 05:22:52 Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2022-02-18 04:27:09 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints